Codewarrior is now gcc except it still costs $2000/year for the license. Consider that when someone tries to make you use a freescale part. Freescale's own libraries they claim to support is all broken now. • CodeWarrior Development Studio for MPC5xx, Professional Edition (Classic, Windows hosted) • CodeWarrior Development Studio for MPC55XX/MPC56XX, Standard Edition (Classic, Windows hosted) • Freescale eTPU/eTPU2 Command-Line Compiler.

I was recently involved in a 'FS' based project for which we bought several CodeWarrior licenses at a cost of around $1500 each. The installations were problematic in several ways.

The 'support' help we got to overcome the installation shortcomings was pathetic at best. On several occasions the licenses 'disappeared' and the ploblem-plagued installation procedure had to be repeated, again with sketchy help from the support personnel ( That is, when they finally answered the phone after repeated attempts to contact them.) C. Getting the printf function to work reliably took weeks of fooling around and multiple calls to multiple 'support centers'. The people who helped with the installation were not the same people who were knowledable about its use in actual program development. The internal Code Warrior Help was completely wrong on this topic. The material in the help topics did not resemble the actual CW environment in any recognizable way.

We finally reached a fellow who explained our problem in 2 minutes and printf has worked flawlessly ever since. He had no idea why the CW Help was so incorrect. The use of the FS processor and thereby the CW development tools was predefined before I got involved in the project. I have never bothered with CodeWarrior. I just gave up after my first attempts. Likewise, I have never tried ProcessorExpert. However, there is nothing too frightening about their chips.

I would suggest Rowley or Keil. If you are using Freescale commercially, you will be using a full licence anyway. Rowley or Keil support will probably be better than Freescale anyway! I don't know which MCU models you are using. The Cortex chips will give hard fault interrupts as a default. IMHO, it is wiser to enable all GPIO as default. Then disable what you don't need.

You still end up with the minimal necessary power consumption. But you retain the will to live in the process.

This is the behaviour of most MCU manufacturers. If not, you can always add it to your startup. Yeah, turns out the clock wasn't getting enabled to port E in 10.6 but it does in 10.5. It wasn't clear that a hard fault could be because a clock is disabled, the docs only say its for memory access out of range. This is something processor export generates code for. If it would let me, I could just add the line of code, but it re-generates and overwrites my fix.

I'm currently digging around this massive processor expert gui to find out how to enable clocks to peripherals. I'd be punching holes into drywall by now but since its an hourly project I can manage my anger.

Quote: 1000USD/one if don't need tracing and QEMU simulation. What do they want to license there? Tracing is a tougher thing. No free options available that I know of (Cortex M). One can easily capture the data but integrating compiler with gprof or elf is a whole different story. BTW, recent OpenOCD 8.0 comes with trace (SWO) for ST-Link and ICDI. Unfortunately I cannot figure out where this data is pushed out.

Yfwk2 EDIT: SWO works fine. At least for logging data to file, 2Mbps with st-link/v2. The on-board TPIU has to be configured with ST-link Utility first. Then ITM_SendChar() does the job. Quote: ImageCraft: Simplifying Embedded Development 'ore features and faster than GCC/Eclipse, @ 1/10th price of IAR, Keil' Our demo is fully functional for 45 days, please check it out if you like. You can start with the -NC non-commercial version for $99 (and you can even get a FREE Arduino compatible board and a JTAG with it for that price) and then move on to the commercial versions at $249 and $599. If you are ready to purchase the commercial version, send me an email richard @imagecraft.com and I will even give you a discount of $50/$100 respectively.

Anwser: if you are having an xlive.dll problem NO MATTER WHAT GAME IT IS it will fix it. - list of games it will fix if you must check. THIS VIDEO HAS BEEN UPDATED CLICK HERE - Here is the link to download the file - https://store.dll-files.com/814/cooki. Xlive.dll is a part of 'Games for Windows Live', from Microsoft. Xlive.dll is normally found in the Windows system folder. If replacing the missing or corrupt xlive.dll does not solve your problem, you might need to re-install the complete Games for Windows Live package. Ordinal 42, xlive.dll I've reinstalled a game onto windows 8 pro which I had on windows 8 release preview. It worked fine before, and when I tried to start it the first time, it said I had a missing dll, which was fine, so I downloaded it and extracted into the sys64 folder. Always make a backup of the files that are overwritten by the File Archive, as the original files are usually required to update the game to a newer version or to.

With our IDE, the users don't write linker files but just select the chips from a list and the IDE generates the correct memory addresses for the compiler/linker. We use the data from Segger so 'all' Cortex-M chips should be supported. At EELive!, a few people came for the demo and asked if we support the Nordic Semi RF Cortex chips. I have not heard of that family until then, but I said, 'well, lets take a look,' and lo and behold, they are there! Silicon vendors have been buying up compiler companies nominally to make sure that they have sufficient support for their chips.